Re: Inför Ryssarnas invasion (2022)
Postat: torsdag 21 mars 2024 13:21
Want to know how Ukraine can resist Russia in 2024? Look to Bilohorivka
Här är ett recept på hur Ukraina kan försvara sig i år och gradvis tippa över maktbalansen till sin fördel nästa år. Varför inte öka ambitionsnivån med Gripen?Euromaidan Press skrev:Based on multiple months of active assaults, the overall pattern can be identified as follows:
1. Russians initiate reconnaissance of the area using UAVs and collect intelligence through technical means.
2. Preceding the assault, Russians deploy KAB (guided air-dropped bombs) against Ukrainian positions and proceed with artillery preparatory shelling.
3. A small number of Russian forces, ranging from a squad to a company in size, advances either on foot or mounted atop vehicles. During the move, Russians try to decrease risks associated with FPV drones, equipping vehicles with electronic warfare (EW) systems like “Lorandit.”
4. Upon encountering initial contact or reaching approximately 50 to 150 meters from Ukrainian positions, attacking units swiftly dismount and proceed to assault, supported by FPV drones and tank fire, if available.
5. Additionally, in efforts to induce chaos and compel Ukrainians to abandon their positions, Russians occasionally deploy chemical grenades containing riot control agents.
[...]
To regain offensive capabilities for 2025, Ukraine must undertake another mobilization while also rotating, training, and reorganizing its troops. Moreover, support from the West will be essential for Ukraine’s offensive in 2025.
Ukrainians cannot afford to employ the same small tactical group exhaustion approach as the Russians due to factors like insufficient artillery ammunition and mobilization resources.
Consequently, Ukrainian forces may need to entrench themselves to buy critical time in 2024. As demonstrated by the Bilohorivka case, this approach can only succeed if Ukraine effectively constructs and staffs fortifications while preventing Russian advances through the use of minefields and artillery fire.
The challenge posed by the extensive use of KABs is likely to persist, and a resolution may only come through the additional procurement and deployment of Patriot air defense systems and F-16s equipped with advanced air-to-air missiles.
Ja, "Ungern men inte Ukraina" är verkligen inget att stoltsera med! Samtidigt verkar Ryssland ha nått vägs ände med sina glidbomber:Omni skrev:Att Ungern tilläts köpa fyra nya Gripenplan i samband med att den svenska Natoansökan godkändes skänker en ”moralisk dimension”, enligt Gummesson.
”Ungern men inte Ukraina är kanske inget att stoltsera med politiskt [...] Ukraina måste få besked om det blir Gripenplan i kriget mot den ryske angriparen eller inte”, skriver han.
Vågar VKS sätta in strategiska bombflygplan av typen Tu-22M vid fronten?Stanimir Dobrev skrev:The cheering of tankies of the FAB-3000 is weird. There's no guidance kit for it. It's not aerodynamic enough to glide as far as other variants & it's doubtful that the pylons of Su-34s can even take a FAB-3000 + a guidence kit even now UMPK FABs drop often due to weight issues.