Storm Shadow fortsätter att leverera! Vad är poängen med Putins krig om han inte ens kan använda Sevastopol?The New York Times skrev:Ukraine’s military claimed on Monday that it had killed the commander of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet in a strike on Crimea — a blow that, if confirmed, would be among the most damaging suffered by the Russian Navy since the sinking of the fleet’s flagship last year.
Citing “new information about the losses of the enemy as a result of the special operation,” Ukraine’s special operations forces said in a statement that the strike on Friday killed 34 officers, including the fleet commander, and wounded 105 others. It did not name the naval leader, but the commander of the Black Sea Fleet is Adm. Viktor Sokolov, one of the most senior officers in Russia’s Navy.
The attack came during a meeting of Russian commanders, Ukraine’s military said, and badly damaged a headquarters of the Russian fleet in Sevastopol, Crimea. The chief of Ukrainian military intelligence, Kyrylo Budanov, also told Voice of America on Saturday that the strike had badly wounded two senior Russian generals — Col. Gen. Aleksandr Romanchuk and Lieut. Gen. Oleg Tsekov. There has been no further word from either side on their condition.
[...]
The Ukrainian statement on Monday also asserted that an attack earlier this month on one of the Russian fleet’s landing ships, the Minsk, had killed 62 sailors — another claim that could not be independently verified. It did not specify a date, but on Sept. 12, a Ukrainian attack on Sevastopol damaged two navy ships, according to the Russian Defense Ministry. Pro-war Russian military bloggers and the Russian news outlet Baza identified them as the Minsk and an attack submarine.
Though it remains the paramount naval power in the Black Sea, the Russian fleet there has suffered multiple setbacks. In April, 2022, Ukraine sank the Moskva cruiser, the fleet’s flagship vessel, with a missile attack. In August 2023, it used naval drones to damage a Russian warship on the far side of the Black Sea.
Crimea is central to the expansive territorial vision that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia has outlined, so Moscow’s inability to protect it from strikes is an embarrassment to the Kremlin, analysts said.
M1 Abrams Tanks Have Arrived In Ukraine
De av USA utlovade Abrams-stridsvagnarna har äntligen börjat anlända i Ukraina. Bättre sent än aldrig!The War Zone skrev:The first of Ukraine’s long-awaited American-supplied M1 Abrams main battle tanks have arrived in the country, the U.S. Department of Defense has confirmed to The War Zone. While we don’t know how many of the tanks have been delivered to Ukraine at this point, Washington has committed to sending 31 of the M1A1 versions and these will surely be committed soon to Kyiv’s ongoing counteroffensive.
Russia Hanging Nets Between Lamp Posts To Counter FPV Drones
Drönarkriget i Ukraina kan mycket riktigt beskrivas som en katt-och-råtta-lek. För närvarande har Ukraina övertaget.The War Zone skrev:First Person View (FPV) drones have become a signature weapon of the conflict in Ukraine, and a wild video posted by the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense today shows just how maneuverable these drones can be — and how hard they are to stop — while another shows the desperate measures being taken to counter them.
In the example below, we see a Ukrainian FPV 'suicide drone' fly through a forest, weaving between trees before entering a Russian dugout, where its warhead presumably detonates. Flying considerably higher, another drone then shows the apparent aftermath of what looks like a successful attack.
[...]
Like many technological aspects of this conflict, FPV drones find themselves at the center of an ongoing cat-and-mouse game between weapons development and countermeasures in Ukraine.
This is well illustrated by another video, this time from the Russian side, showing one such effort to protect against FPV drones. The video shows how Russian forces erected camouflage nets on light poles over roadways near war-torn Bakhmut to stop or otherwise deter Ukrainian FPV drones attempting to strike its vehicles on the roadway.
[...]
Not long after this video was posted, however, at least one Ukrainian drone operator figured out a simple workaround. As you can see, the Ukrainian FPV drone simply flies over the netting and into a nearby tank. While it's possible the netting in the video may have been geolocated in advance, the barrier would likely also be fairly obvious to the operator.
Russian Lancet flew 70 km and damaged a Ukrainian MiG-29 fighter
Däremot är Ryssland näppeligen ute ur leken.BulgarianMilitary.com skrev:The video clearly shows that the Lancet drone is indeed heading for a Ukrainian plane grounded on the runway. An explosion followed in the front of the plane’s fuselage. It is not clear from the smoke resulting from the explosion and from the interruption of the video, whether the drone actually inflicted damages on the MiG-29, as well as what they were.
Sprinter’s claim that the nearest Russian position was 70 km from the airport may be true, but that does not mean that the Russian Lancet actually flew that distance or longer than that.
The Russian Lancet drone is perhaps one of the few Russian weapons that have proven effective in Russia’s special military operation [a term Moscow uses instead of the war in Ukraine]. Since the beginning of this year, the Russian armed forces have increased the use of the Lancet, and the drone is reaping success.
Bizarre Iranian ‘Loitering SAM’ Shown To Russian Defense Minister
Frågan är om samma sak kan sägas om Iran...The War Zone skrev:The Iranian government has shown a curious "loitering" surface-to-air missile known only as the "358" to Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu who is currently visiting the country. This is the first time authorities in Iran have admitted their role in designing this unusual weapon, examples of which have previously been supplied to proxy forces in Yemen and Iraq.
[...]
To date, there is no hard evidence of a 358 shooting down anything, despite reports that attempts have been made. A "United States military official said that the 358 missiles from Iran had been fired against American drones flying in Yemeni airspace," according to the 2020 New York Times report.
Iranian Back Houthi rebels have succeeded in shooting down U.S. and Saudi Arabian drones over Yemen using traditional surface-to-missiles. The group has also claimed to have shot down multiple combat jets belonging to the Saudi Arabian-led coalition over the years, including Saudi F-15s and Tornados, with various factory-produced and improvised air defense systems.
Still, the underlying concept behind the 358 missile is very intriguing. If the weapon works as described, they could be launched into forward areas where drones or helicopters are known or expected to travel through, and hunt and kill them without any need for additional advanced offboard sensors. This could be particularly useful for engaging incoming drones, which can be very hard to spot and engage with traditional air defense systems.