dr Cassandra Nojdh skrev: ↑lördag 02 mars 2024 7:39
Det finns alltså tre (minst) möjligheter.
- Samtalet är ett resultat av rysk telefonavlyssning. dvs spioneri
I så fall har Bunderwehr en hel del att jobba på när det gäller säkra kommunikationskanaler.
- Samtalet har spelats in av någon i den tyska miiltärförvaltningen och "läckts" till ryssarna, säkert via någon mellanhand, för att minska risken för spårbarhet (Enceladus-kolletivets propagandafloskel: "Kan den tyska militären också ha tröttnat på Scholz och hans lögner?")
Det är i så fall landsförrädisk verksamhet i stil med vad unge Jack Teixeira ägnade sig åt.
- Samtalet är deepfake
Det är fritt fram för egna trosuppfattningar, tydligen. Om man vill spela
-ens advokat, eller liknande.
Putin’s masterful spy op leaves Scholz in the cold
POLITICO skrev:“No one really knows why the chancellor is blocking,” Gen. Gerhartz says at one point. He goes on to describe what he calls “wild rumors” about why Berlin isn’t sending Taurus, including that the missiles don’t work properly, a suggestion he dismissed as “nonsense.” The general reveals he heard the rumor from a reporter “who is extremely close to the chancellor.”
[...]
Last week, senior Green MP Anton Hofreiter said Scholz was “obviously not telling the truth” about the Taurus missiles, noting Germany had sent 260 to South Korea without the kind of targeting support the chancellor described. Hofreiter suggested the real reason for Scholz’s reluctance could be that “he has no trust in the Ukrainians.”
[...]
One “unique selling point” of Taurus, the officers suggested, was that the missiles are particularly precise, which could make it easier for Ukraine to take out strategic targets such as the Kerch Bridge linking Russia and Crimea. One of the officers said the air force had “intensively studied” how to destroy the bridge, predicting Ukraine would need 10-20 Taurus missiles to do so.
Scholz anklagas för att inte säga sanningen av sina egna koalitionspartier. Hur länge överlever regeringen, d.v.s. behöver Ukraina hålla ut ända till nästa val?
Ukrainian drone attacks oil depot in Russia's Belgorod region
Ukrinform skrev:The Ukrainian Defense Ministry's Main Intelligence Directorate (HUR) has carried out an attack on an oil depot of JSC Belgorodnefteprodukt in Russia's Belgorod region, using a Ukrainian-made drone.
[...]
At least nine oil depots and refineries in Russia have been struck since the beginning of 2024, including in the Bryansk, Kursk, Volgograd, Yaroslavl, Leningrad and Krasnodar regions and in St. Petersburg.
Energikriget fortsätter. Som bekant
tryter de ryska missilerna samtidigt som Ukraina bekämpar de iranska drönarna. Ryssland kan tyvärr inte säga samma sak.
The European Union-Russia energy divorce: state of play
Bruegel skrev:Commercial conditions in the Chinese market are worse for Russia than in the European market. Russia is estimated to charge $10/MWh on deliveries to China via the Power of Siberia pipeline, while it charges around $34/MWh on deliveries to Europe (Demertzis et al, 2022).
Kina är knappast en livlina, åtminstone inte för Gazprom!
What 2024's crucial elections mean for climate change
Nature skrev:In the unlikely event that Modi loses, Selvaraju says he doesn’t expect a shift away from India’s dual push for renewables and coal, “simply because it’s not really in the hands of the politicians”. Unlike in the United States, India’s climate policies don’t flip-flop according to who is in power, says Dhruba Purkayastha, director for India at the non-profit research group Climate Policy Initiative, based in New Delhi.
[...]
The plan to cut emissions does not include a phase-out of fossil fuels, on which the Russian economy is highly dependent. “Russia is not itself going to reduce its fossil-fuel economy. If it goes down, it is because of other countries’ policies — Russia will clearly sell fossil fuel as long as someone buys it,” says Anna Korppoo, who studies Russian climate policy at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute in Fornebu, Norway. Proposed targets to expand tree-based carbon sinks are unlikely to be met, she says: these sinks are currently in decline and there are no national policies to reverse the trend.
[...]
Another sticking point is carbon capture and storage technologies, which the EU will have to rely on if it is going to meet its most ambitious emissions targets. Right-leaning parties tend to favour these technological solutions over those that require behavioural change, but they have not been shown to work at scale. “The other carbon capture techniques of planting forests, upgrading our soils and nature-based solutions are already facing a lot of backlash,” says Dupont.
Indien är inte heller på Rysslands sida. Det är däremot den europeiska högern som förordar ineffektiv lagring av koldioxid framför utfasning av fossila bränslen.
för att italienarna surnar till. Vore det för Ukraina skulle hade de ju lika gärna kunna tagit ett av sina egna system, men nu vill de tydligen knäppa slovakerna på näsan. Hade Slovakien visat intresse för att anskaffa SAMP/T hade det kanske blivit annat ljud i skällan.